This plan is looking for three kinds of people: those who can improve it, those who can attack it, and those who can put it in front of someone who matters. All three start at the same address.
Join the working group
A framework becomes a plan when named expertise has beaten on it. The working group being assembled — ten to twenty people — needs, specifically:
- Security practitioners — deterrence, counterterrorism, border architecture — to stress-test the mechanism against scenarios its authors haven't imagined;
- International lawyers — to pressure-test the countermeasures framing, the adjudication body's design, and the annexation-and-transfer package;
- Cartographers and GIS analysts — to finalize the line, the tracts, the queue, and the settlement schedule of Annex A;
- Development economists and finance professionals — to turn Annex C from an illustrative schedule into a bankable one, and to design the escrow, guarantee, and compensation structures;
- People who know Palestinian and Israeli politics from the inside — to correct what the document gets wrong about both societies, which its authors assume is plenty.
The commitment is a working one — review, argument, drafting — not a letterhead one. Members may be named, pseudonymous, or fully anonymous, at their choice, and may dissent publicly from any provision while working on the rest; the group's output will record disagreements rather than paper over them. Write with a line on what you'd tear apart first: contact@tzabarplan.org.
Attack the plan
The standing invitation, and it is not rhetorical: the most useful thing a skeptical expert can do with this document is break it in public or in private, and the most useful attacks come with arithmetic — a scenario the schedule mishandles, a rate that produces a perverse incentive, a legal argument the objections chapter hasn't met, a political assumption an insider knows to be false. Criticism that survives scrutiny gets incorporated into the master version, with credit if you want it and silence if you don't. The document's What would change the authors' minds entry (in the FAQ) is a genuine list. Same address.
Put it in front of someone
If this plan reaches a decision-maker, it will not be through this website. It will be because someone forwarded the Brief — a fifteen-minute read, available as a PDF — with two personal lines to a person who should see it. That is the single highest-value act a supporter can perform, and it costs five minutes. If you know a desk this belongs on — in a ministry, a campaign, a newsroom, a think tank, a royal court — send it there, or write and the working group will find the warmer route: contact@tzabarplan.org.
Journalists and researchers: inquiries to the same address are answered, on the record or on background.
Stay in touch
Occasional dispatches when something real happens — a substantive revision, a response to serious criticism, a development that moves the window. No schedule, no noise.
(Embed the signup form here.)
For institutions
Think tanks, university programs, and funders interested in hosting a roundtable, commissioning a critique, red-teaming the mechanism, or supporting the working group's technical costs (cartography, legal drafting, the calculator's public build): write directly. The plan has no institutional home by design — it belongs to its arguments — but it collaborates with anyone willing to test them seriously.
contact@tzabarplan.org — for all of the above. The most useful attacks come with arithmetic.